Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

This entry in the series “Things the Bible Doesn’t Say” is a recommendation from a pastor friend of mine.  I imagine you have heard this phrase numerous times whether you’re involved in a church or not.  ”Let go and let God” has become one of the American Church’s favorites, somewhere between a proverb and a cliche.

Every culture has its proverbs and its cliches.  Proverbs are short, catchy vehicles for some bit of wisdom.  What is important to understand is that proverbs, whether cultural and/or biblical, are not necessarily promises or truths that are relevant to every situation.  Some are intended to be.  Some are not.  For instance, is it better late than never or does slow and steady win the race?  Yes…depending on what the life situation is your are talking about.   As we’ve seen with some of the other “things the Bible doesn’t say,” there tends to be an element of godly wisdom/truth in many of our American Christian proverbs.  Problems arise when we try to make them into something they are not: an entire philosophy of life wrapped up in 12 words or less.

Which brings us to “Let go and let God.”  What is the good, solid, Gospel wisdom behind this pithy aphorism?  Well, I actually think there is Gospel right at the heart of it.  The Gospel (“Good News”) has many dimensions and can be expressed in a variety of ways.  But one of the keys to the Gospel is that it is something that God has done before it is something we do.  It is God who allowed an aged Sarah to give birth to the child of promise, God who liberated the Hebrew slaves from Egypt, God who fights his people’s battles for them, God who delivers Judah from the hands of the Assyrians, God who enters into the world and delivers people from sin,  God who raised Jesus from the dead, and God who is making all things new.  The list goes on and on.

In fact, you could point to story after story in the Scriptures where the whole point is that if we try to do things our way in our timing with our strength, we act futilely.  Think of Abraham and Sarah enlisting Hagar to bear the child God promised, and God’s rejection of that plan.  Think of the sound defeat of the Hebrew army when they presume to go into battle without Yahweh.  Think of God’s rejection of Saul as king because he took matters into his own hands.  Think of Paul’s wonderful words, “it is by grace you have been saved through faith, and this is not of your own doing; it is the gift of God.”

So, might “Let go and let God” be a really helpful reminder?  Absolutely.  People who are striving for blessing instead of receiving God’s gift must let go of their preoccupation with earning and let God give them the gift of salvation.  People who think that they need to reach some standard to earn God’s love need to let go of their lone-ranger efforts and let God bring transformation into their hearts.  People who are clinging to certain ways of thinking and doing need to let go of their own ideas and let God guide them onto the Way of Christ.

Here’s the “but.”  But “Let go and let God” is not all there is to the Christian life.  As James reminds us, “Faith without works is dead.”  When Jesus teaches us how to love him, he speaks of obedience.  When people ask Peter on Pentecost, “What must we do to be saved?” Peter does not answer, “Let go and let God.”  He answers, “Repent and be baptized…”

As Dallas Willard has helpfully pointed out, there is a difference between earning and effort.  Earning is non-Gospel.  Effort is active participation in the new life of Christ.   There is also a difference between doing our things and responding to God.  Doing things on our own is non-Christian.  Responding to God’s call is the work of Christian discipleship.  In order to be helpful, the one who encourages another to “Let go and let God” must wisely discern if the situation is appropriate.  Let me finish by giving a little more concreteness to where “Let go and let God” will probably not be appropriate theologically or practically:

  • If someone is wrestling with something the Spirit has laid on their heart to do (think the rich man asked to give up all his possessions and follow Jesus).  In our culture, “Let go” may well imply passivity, whereas we dare not sit back “in God’s grace” and ignore some way we have been called to actively obey his commands.
  • Similarly, (it should go without saying) “Let go and let God” can be a pretty awful approach to the mission of the Church.  ”Let go and let God…” …feed the hungry?  bring the Gospel to remote parts of the world?  seek justice?  sit with the one who is grieving?  I don’t think so.
  • If someone is dealing with grief.  In fact, most pithy proverbs are utterly unhelpful in grief situations.  It is nearly impossible to simply “let go” of emotions.  It may not even be a good thing to begin with.  We often need to sit in our grief, loss, and disorientation until God meets us there and leads us on the path out.  In this case, it’s often the “comforter” who needs to “Let go and let God” bring deep healing and comfort to the person in grief while simply being present and available.
  • If it means sitting on the couch and watching The Bachelorette ;)  ”Letting go” doesn’t mean “do nothing.”  It is an active process of bringing whatever it is we need to let go of before the Lord.  There is a direction to our “let go.”  As Peter exhorts, “Cast all your anxiety on [God] because he cares for you.”  To “let go” of things that need to be let go of takes supernatural strength sometimes.  Addictions, anxieties, and sinful patterns rarely can just be “let go.”  ”Waiting on the Lord” is not passive.  It is a difficult movement–empowered by the Spirit–towards God, towards God’s Community, towards practices that form us into Christ-likeness

One of my favorite TV shows is Project Runway (yeah, I said it).  The designers focus on making a cool garment, and then they are availed of an “accessory wall” with shoes, jewelry, etc.  Tim Gunn, the designers’ “mentor,” always encourages them to “use the accessory wall…thoughtfully.”  Such is the case with proverbs.  “Let go and let God” can be a helpful encouragement…at times.  But use phrases like this…thoughtfully.  Know what they mean, when they apply, when they come up short, and when something more personal or nuanced might be better suited.  And just remember, a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.  Am I right?

 

One man accuses a Parkinson’s sufferer of exaggerating his symptoms and calls a woman he has never met a “slut.”  Another man actively tries to infect a politician with the flu virus and calls the silent protest against an anti-Bible rant “pansy-a–ed.”  Perhaps you already know who these two men are.  But if so, pretend you don’t.  At first glance, do these seem like a couple of guys you would want to be formative forces in your life?  Or better yet, your children’s lives?   Both of these men do have great influence on different sectors of our society; they are Rush Limbaugh and Daniel Savage, respectively.   Limbaugh, of course, is a long-time conservative political talk-show host.  Savage is a sex-advice columnist and the innovator of the “It Gets Better” campaign that seeks to influence teens struggling with their sexuality away from suicide.

Now, the goal of this post is not to voice either agreement or disagreement with either Limbaugh’s or Savage’s “positions” on the issues they speak about.  Nor is it to try to stand above and scold them.  The purpose of this post is to ask, “To whom do we listen and learn?” and “Why?”  Because here’s the thing: in our technological, globalized society, we pretty much have the opportunity to listen and learn from anybody!  And here’s what I want to suggest: whether it comes to choosing a pundit, a university, a pastor, or a political candidate, we vastly undervalue the importance of virtue.  We give priority to what a person “values” over a person’s “virtue.”

This idea is not original to me.  I heard it in a lecture by theologian Dr. David Wells a few years back.  As I remember, he was speaking about politics.  His main thesis was that when we vote, we vote based on values rather than virtues…and as Christians, that is problematic.  We are used to hearing “values” spoken of on the political right, so I’ll start there.  For conservatives, as long as a candidate has the correct “values” (pro-life, “traditional marriage,” small government, etc.), that is the candidate we should vote for.  For the left, the values determining values might be something like pro-choice, “marriage equality,” unions, and “pro-environment.”  (I realize I am generalizing a bit.)  The key, though, is that decisions are made based on a candidate’s overall policies, his/her “values.”  Contrast that to prioritizing virtue.  This might go something like this: if I see evidence of a candidate’s sense of justice, compassion, wisdom, and willingness to listen, I would be able to vote for and trust them to be a good leader.

Case in point: Bill Clinton after the Monica Lewinsky scandal.  The stance of many was that Clinton’s character (infidelity to wife, abuse of power, workplace ethics, deception) was more of a “private” issue, and had no real effect on his capacity to be a “good” leader (read: follow through on the “right” policies) for the country.  (It would have been really interesting to see how this would have played out if Clinton hadn’t already been in his second term.)

Of course, one of the problems is that a person’s virtues are far more difficult to discern than someone’s values.  They also don’t fit quite as neatly on a bumper sticker.  But not only that: we are taught that we will impact the world by having right answers and great ideas, not by being virtuous (I’ll come back to this another time).

Jesus–and I would suggest the Scriptures as a whole–are loathe to subordinate virtue to value.  The greatest commandment, says Jesus, is love: love God and love neighbor.  Love–biblically–is about character.  Paul goes on to speak of the “fruits of the Spirit” (love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control).  These are the marks of “the good life” according to the Gospel, and they are all aspects of character.  How often do we look for these traits in the people we listen to, learn from, vote for, or follow?

I am not a moral or political relativist.  I do believe there are things that are right and wrong, better and worse, helpful and harmful.  This is a tension I myself very much feel when I am listening, learning, and voting.  I get excited about creative ideas, and innovative arguments, and I want to vote for people who value things I think are important.  But I am tempered by the Kingdom of God and its King, who say that the Kingdom is an inside-out thing, a heart thing, a character thing.  (Just read Jesus’ Kingdom Manifesto.)

As a pastor, I am confronted with this reality.  There are many people who listen to my sermons and other teachings and will choose to side with me or against me based on whether they think I am on the right side or wrong side of issues, whether I present my position in an engaging or eloquent way, and whether I get results (butts in the pews).  I am intensely aware of the discrepancy between my values and my virtues.  I freely admit this to you.  I do not always live up to the Kingdom Vision I preach (and blog).   It’s not that I’m pretending to be better than I am, just that it’s easier to value the right things than to live the right way, easier to say well than live well.  My concern is being a pastor who gains followers because I value Gospel things, regardless of whether I have Gospel virtue.  Because as a culture, we are trained to follow people in exactly that way: values > virtue.

Rush Limbaugh and David Savage, I think, reveal this cultural training that I sense as a pastor.  Just because someone comes up with a campaign that might be helpful for struggling teens or might have some valid political insights, is that enough to “make up for” the serious character questions that certain actions have raised?  Jesus says that his followers will impact the world with God’s Kingdom not because of their cleverness, but because of their character.  And if we truly are putting our highest value on Jesus and his Kingdom, then we must value virtue.

I’ll close with 2 quick and simple thoughts for putting virtue back into your list of values.  1) Kingdom virtues are formed relationally/locally.  Lighten up on always trying to learn from the people with the most “expertise” or “success,” find someone whose character you respect, and allow that person to influence you on a heart level.  2) Catch yourself when you defend the people you listen to by saying, “But they’re right…”  Admittedly, I have a very limited grasp of the virtue/character of Rush Limbaugh and Dan Savage.  But from what I have seen, if I am looking for a conservative political viewpoint, I am going to try to find someone else, whose character I respect; and if I’m going to direct struggling teens to someone who can encourage and counsel them through difficult times, I’m going to look elsewhere to someone who does so in a loving, Christ-like manner.  God may use these two in some positive ways–he often uses all of us in spite of our weakness–but I would rather spend my time with people whose character and ideas will contribute to my growth in love, joy, peace, etc.

Virtue is a growth process.  It’s not something I’ve achieved or really anyone has.  But I hope that Christians seriously value this virtue process.  I hope that while we refuse to cut ourselves off from people with suspect character, we are also intent on engaging in formative relationships with people who will contribute to our growth in the Way of Love.  I hope we don’t get caught up in thinking that “being right” about things is good enough.  And I hope that the people who look at us will be profoundly affected by our Christ-like virtue, not just our “values.”

 

http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Content?oid=3092

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/10/22/obama-joins-it-gets-better-campaign-dan-savage-says-make-it-better/

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2018110513_savage01m.html?prmid=4939

http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2012/04/30/anti-bullying-speaker-attacks-bible-christian-teens/